Captain Jelly Belly is really, really into following rules. This is usually a pretty good thing, as once he knows what we expect of him, we can trust him to follow our wishes exactly to the letter. I can leave him alone with markers or paint and I never have to worry about him colouring on the table or the walls. I can take Gal Smiley upstairs for a nap and I never have to worry that the Captain has let himself out of the house, or is emptying the cutlery drawer, or is eating pennies. He’d never dream of touching our stereo equipment and he always reminds us to buckle his seat belt if he has been sitting in the car for three nanoseconds without us getting around to it.
Here’s an classic example of CJB rule following. Last night we brought out his Spiderman PJs, which he hasn’t worn all winter since they are a lightweight, springtime kind of pyjama. He was so excited — he’s really into superheroes now — and he played Spiderman all last evening and this morning. This morning when it was time to get dressed, convinced him, after a lot of effort, to take off the PJs and put on clothes, by explaining that his clothes were his “Peter Parker” undercover outfit.
Then, after had gone to work, CJB came to me very tentatively and asked if please, please, would it be alright if he pretended to be Spiderman, even though he had a Peter Parker outfit on? And I said, of course, dear, you can pretend to be Spiderman anytime! He was just so happy to hear that pretending to be Spiderman fit inside the rules, and zoomed off to fight the Green Goblin. Here is a little boy who is going to do very well in the highly structured environment of school.
Lately, CJB’s desire to adhere to the rules has caused friction between him and Gal Smiley. GS is not so into the rules — she’s much more curious and adventuresome, and likes to test boundaries. As a result, she can give CJB a heart attack just with the most innocent of actions — daring to take her juice cup onto the new couch, for example, or boldly taking three or four steps off of the front mat while wearing shoes. CJB usually freaks out at these occasions, certain that GS is facing certain doom, either because the breaking of a rule means imminent danger, or because the breaking of a rule means incurring the wrath of Mommy and Daddy. When CJB has to sit on the naughty step — which he hasn’t had to do for ages and ages — he wails and cries like the end of the world is near, and requires a huge amount of consoling afterwards. GS, on the other hand, sits there happily chatting to herself, and doesn’t seem to care at all if she is ever allowed to get up.
CJB also loves to make up rules for GS to follow, and then she pays him no mind at all, which causes him to stress out even more. When they’re playing together, he’ll say stuff like, “No, Gal Smiley! You can’t put the blue car on the blue couch, only on the black couch!” or maybe, “Gal Smiley! If you are pretending to be Woody, you can only jump on the red pillows, not the green ones!” They’re completely random rules, and he would be so much happier if he didn’t make them, because GS is only going to break them anyway, but he can’t seem to stop himself.
It’s a fine line, as a mom, to know what to do here. Sometimes I intervene, because I don’t want CJB to get too upset for no good reason, and I don’t like the way he tries to control their play and boss GS around. But on the other hand, I don’t want to be constantly policing their social interaction, because they have to learn for themselves how to play nicely together. GS is usually pretty easy going with The Little Rulemaker, so they play together very well, but when she wants to do her own thing, they often dissolve into a big fight. I’ll step in if pushing and shoving is involved (usually, only on GS’s side, because CJB knows that pushing and hitting is AGAINST THE RULES, JESUS). But when they’re just playing, I try to stay out of it as much as I can stand, and just let them be who they are going to be.
I guess in the end, that’s the hardest job a parent will ever have — stepping back and letting their kids find their own way. The desire to do everything for them is really tempting. At least with CJB around, I don’t have to worry too much about anyone getting in trouble — he’ll be right there to make a citizen’s arrest.
I was thinking about this difference the other day, actually. I mean, how CJB is down with rules and GS isn’t, which usually means GS is doing something she’s not supposed to.
Having grown up the GS of the family, I’d vote that you continue doing a good job of staying out of their interactions as much as you can, but not just because it will teach them how to work stuff out.
As a kid, I was always in trouble. Not because I was “bad” but because I was curious and adventuresome. True, that usually invites a bit of danger and some rule breaking, but I don’t think it was to be “bad”. I think GS is the same way. She’s not trying to be bad so much as she is figuring out how stuff works.
Anyway, the problem with us growing up is that because I was the GS and you other three were mostly CJBs, I got in trouble all of the time. Not only did I get in trouble when I was being my usual curious self, but when some sister would tattle on me, even if I wasn’t doing anything, I’d get in trouble because mom assumed the problem had to be me. LittleSis picked up on this fact at a very young age and used it pretty much until I moved out. Grrr.
I have no doubt that you’ll know the difference between made up tattling and real problems, but from GS’s point of view, if you always intervened, she’ll get the impression that you don’t like her like you like CJB because you’re always getting her in trouble and not CJB. She won’t be able to understand that it’s because CJB just “behaves” better.
So it’s a fine line. You certainly don’t want to let GS get away with everything, but it’s going to be tough to keep things balanced. I have good faith that you’ll do so, but I thought I’d share my story anyway. 🙂
We’ve definitely seen our share of families where one kid always gets the default blame. I think we both don’t want to see that happen in our family. One thing that we have done that I really like is that neither one gets in trouble just on the other one’s say so (unless someone has gotten an obvious, major injury). If someone comes to “tattle” and we did not witness the event with our own eyes, then instead of just yelling at the other one, we talk to the tattler about how they should handle it. So, if A comes to tell us that N hit him, I talk to A about what he should do about it himself — tell N he doesn’t like that; warn her that if she does it again, he will not want to play with her; and if she does do it again, move away from her and find something else to do so he does not get hit again. If N complains that A stole something from her, then we go over those rules too — first, ask A nicely for the nice (using “please”); then, offer him a trade for something else; lastly, if he still says no, then wait patiently for her turn.
In general, these days, Gal Smiley is getting more time-outs (and not a lot, at that), and those are strictly for hitting, pushing, or extreme swiping. But I do find that the Captain gets in “trouble” more, in terms of getting a stern warning about stuff, like being bossy or whiny or shrieking at GS. It’s because we expect more from him at this age — he has a sense of empathy, and heaven knows, he knows the rules, so when he acts up, he gets in trouble right away. Gal Smiley gets more gentle warnings. We’ll have to see how things change as they grow up!
I don’t know why, but the “shrieking at GS” made me laugh out loud.